Abstract
The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools like ChatGPT has transformed academic writing and learning practices. While these technologies offer convenience and efficiency, their long-term cognitive implications remain underexplored. This article analyzes a recent MIT study that tracked 54 students over four months to evaluate the neural and cognitive effects of ChatGPT use in educational settings. Using EEG scans, performance metrics, and qualitative interviews, the study found that students relying on ChatGPT—regardless of how strategically—demonstrated reduced brain activity, weaker memory formation, diminished cognitive ownership, and homogenized writing. In contrast, students who worked without external tools developed stronger neural networks and cognitive resilience. Crucially, students who built foundational thinking skills before using AI experienced cognitive enhancement rather than suppression. These findings challenge current assumptions about responsible AI use in education and highlight the urgent need for cognitive protectionism—deliberately preserving mental effort in early learning stages. The article calls for a fundamental redesign of assessment, pedagogy, and policy to ensure that AI enhances rather than replaces human cognition in the classroom.